As astronomer Robert Kirshner of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics describes it, "Once a star has built an iron core, there is no way it can generate energy by fusion. The star, radiating energy at a prodigious rate, becomes like a teenager with a credit card.
Using resources much faster than can be replenished, it is perched on the edge of disaster. But the edge of disaster for these massive stars is the threshold of life for the rest of the periodic table. In a star's last second of life, its core compacts so tightly that it becomes as dense as an atomic nucleus.
When no more matter can squeeze into the core, the star explodes with the energy of an octillion 10 27 atomic bombs. In this violent explosion , more than half the elements on the periodic table are born. Intense heat from the explosion catalyzes nuclear reactions that were not possible in the core. Escaping elements are bombarded with neutrons, which split inside the nucleus into protons and electrons, generating new unique elements.
Iron turns into gold, gold turns into lead, and so on until uranium, the heaviest naturally star-born element, is forged from the ashes. This spectacular shower of life and death creates everything. Well, almost everything. There are another 27 elements on the periodic table after uranium that were not created by stars.
Some elements are produced in trace amounts by the decay of other elements. But even the long radioactive decay chain is not enough to produce the ultra-heavy elements at the end of the periodic table.
The periodic table would have ended altogether if scientists had not pushed the boundaries of natural physics and ventured deeper into the world of super heavy elements. To make new elements, scientists borrowed some advice from the heavens. The transuranium elements elements 95 through were forged by bombarding uranium with neutrons and waiting for the impregnated nucleus to become radioactive and convert its extra neutron into a proton, electron, and a charge-less, nearly massless, antineutrino.
But after fermium element , the irradiate-and-wait technique stops working. Particle physicists "stepped up their game" and upgraded their atomic fodder from neutrons to other elements. The trick was to get the nuclei of the two atoms to fuse into one giant nucleus, generating an entirely unique atom.
Instead, they are found either dissolved in water in an ionic form, such as sodium ions and chloride ions, or as parts of large molecules, such as haemoglobin. Scientists believe that about 25 of the known elements are essential to life. These four elements are found in the basic structure of all biochemical molecules. For example, glucose is a carbohydrate and its molecular formula is C 6 H 12 O 6 — each molecule of glucose is made up of 6 carbon atoms, 12 hydrogen atoms and 6 oxygen atoms.
The other elements found can be divided into two main groups — major elements and trace elements. The human body functions as a result of a large number of chemical reactions involving compounds of all of these elements. Although many of the elements are required in only very small amounts, they do play a very important role in keeping the body working effectively:. Too little of any given essential element can result in ill health and, if left untreated, could result in death:. Scientific knowledge is never absolute or certain.
As scientists discover more about essential elements needed in the diet, old beliefs may have to change in light of new evidence. Elements are essential to so many things — check out the role of micronutrients for human health. Read our privacy policy. Philip Ball investigates. And yet no one can say quite what an element is. The question was debated with much vigour and occasional passion during a meeting of the International Society for the Philosophy of Chemistry in Bristol in July — but still without producing any consensus.
And some of the participants of the meeting implied that this might be for the best. We agree right? Is molecular hydrogen gas an element? Or the isolated hydrogen atom? Some might say: who cares? We know what we mean in practice. Elena Ghibaudi of the University of Turin in Italy worries that this failure to define an element precisely raises problems of understanding, communication and trust in teaching. There could be problems for the public understanding of chemistry too.
Schwarz points to how, because some elements become associated with toxic substances — chlorine gas, say, or sulfur in the sulfur dioxide released from burning coal and oil — the element itself may become regarded as inherently toxic, and vulnerable to chemically illiterate bans.
So it seems reasonable to expect chemistry to provide an unambiguous definition. Like the idea of atoms, elements suffer rather than benefit from an illusion of continuity in a long tradition of thought.
The popular story has it that the ancient Greeks thought there were just four elements — earth, air, fire and water — but that from around the eighteenth century we began to appreciate that there are rather more than four, and that none corresponds to these ancient elements. The truth is more complex. The three principles of Paracelsus, for example, were seen more as properties than ingredients: sulfur representing combustibility, salt solidity and mercury fluidity.
And it is highly provisional, hostage to your analytical capabilities. How could you be sure that you had an element and not just a compound that no one had yet found a way of splitting into its ingredients?
Lavoisier followed Boyle in asserting that an element represents the final stage of analysis. Francis Aston discovered isotopes in , which have the same Z but different atomic mass. At first, though, isotopes threw a cat among the pigeons.
The question was whether or not each isotope should occupy its own place in the periodic table. That, you might think, could have been the end of the matter: elements are defined by Z. This double meaning is uncomfortable.
0コメント